Semesters were built for a world of stable careers. Today’s learners need modular, stackable, and verifiable learning that unfolds across decades. I sketch the architecture of a new academic time: micro-credentials with integrity, cumulative assessment, and “requalification windows” every five years. The degree should become a durable base, not a terminal promise.
Semesters were built for a world timed by harvests and railways. You arrived in late summer, learned in the fall, rested in winter, repeated in spring, and left in May to become a useful adult until retirement presented you with a gold watch and a gentle slope into evening. This calendar still governs universities even as the world it was designed for has vanished. Careers now fracture, recombine, and retool; knowledge has a half-life; software updates faster than curricula; middle age brings a surprise: you are a beginner again.
A Calendar for Harvests and Railways
The degree, in this arrangement, functions like a terminal promise: complete four years now and enjoy a lifetime of competence. It is an attractive fiction. Employers treat it as a warranty well past the expiration date; graduates treat it as a talisman in labor markets that respect amulets less each year. In response, a marketplace of micro-credentials has proliferated—badges, nanodegrees, playlists with certificates at the end. Flexibility is no longer the problem. Trust is.
Here lies the paradox. The more modular learning becomes, the less meaningful it is unless we strengthen the joints. A long degree signals something coherent but often obsolete; short credentials are timely but often incoherent. Modern universities, living by converting complexity into structured time, find their core instrument—the calendar—now mismatches the environment. The solution is not to abolish rhythm; it is to compose a new one.
The Degree as Basecamp, Not Summit
We need a new academic time that is both modular and cumulative, flexible and accountable. The degree should become a durable base camp, not a terminal summit, with scheduled returns to acclimatize to new altitudes.
The architecture for this is not a slogan; it is a calendar. It must be built on four pillars: micro-credentials that have integrity, assessments that are cumulative, requalification windows that are routine, and an institutional operating system that treats time as a renewable resource, not a one-time expenditure. This new calendar is a design for a new relationship with our graduates.
- Issue micro-credentials with integrity. A credential is not a badge; it’s a warranty. Every one must have a public anatomy: a clear competency statement (verbs, not nouns), a specified assessment type (e.g., performance task, oral defense), and a refresh-by date for competencies that decay.
- Make claims inspectable. Credentials must link to a portfolio of evidence—anonymized artifacts, code logs, or lab notebooks—so that claims are verifiable. Employers read less fiction when you show them a chapter.
- Use external moderation. Just as research trusts peer review, teaching must afford it. Rotate external examiners or practitioner panels to sample assessments and calibrate standards. This is how integrity is built.
- Require laddered capstones. Modularity is dangerous without memory. Every bundle of micro-credentials must culminate in an integrative task—a deployed application, a simulated case, a comparative essay—scored by a human panel. Badges count; synthesis counts more.
- Prioritize the oral defense. As machines get better at producing products, humans must get better at judging process. The oral defense—requiring learners to justify their choices, explain dead ends, and defend their reasoning—becomes the primary tool for verifying provenance.
- Establish the five-year “right of return.” Every graduate receives, as part of their degree, a guaranteed re-entry slot every five years for a short, credit-bearing update. This is not an application; it is a calendar appointment with their future.
- Run diagnostic audits. Each requalification window begins with a “capability audit” against current field outcomes. This generates a personalized plan—”refresh X, add Y, demonstrate Z”—making the learning efficient. This is how a mid-career nurse returns, identifies new sepsis protocols, and completes a single studio on interdisciplinary casework, making her safer and more confident.
- Build a “braided calendar.” Offer three temporal formats year-round: 5-week sprints for drills, 10-week studios for projects, and 15-week seasons for deep theory. Learners braid these formats based on need and life, replacing “drop everything for school” with “integrate school on purpose.”
- Launch the new ledger. The registrar must become version control. We must issue verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials that record competencies, assessment types, and links to evidence. The transcript becomes a living portfolio.
- Institute “time banking.” Grant learners “time credits” at graduation (e.g., 12 credits) redeemable over a decade for requalification. Employers can contribute; governments can top up. The unit of currency is not just dollars, but hours of guided, assessed learning.
This is not vocationalism in disguise; it is education that refuses to become obsolete. The architecture preserves the university’s codes—truth/not-truth, qualification/non-qualification—by strengthening assessment and human judgment. It will be expensive, but the current model is more so, hiding its costs by deferring them to employers and individuals who must relearn alone.
And what of equity? If we let the market set the timetable, the privileged will get the updates while others are left with expired warranties. A just calendar must be built with public vouchers, wraparound supports, and a ruthless focus on reducing the administrative load for working learners. The worst inequity is to award a terminal degree to students who will need to requalify without help.
From ‘Best By: Never’ to a Living Ledger
A university that embraces this new calendar will know it’s working. It will be able to issue verifiable credentials with external moderation. It will enroll its own graduates in five-year requalification windows, not as a novelty, but as a rhythm. It will have a “braided calendar” that allows learners to stack credentials into cumulative, juried capstones.
If it cannot do these things, it does not have a new calendar; it just has a brochure.
The current arrangement treats a degree like a can of food with a label that never changes: “best by: never.” We display it on a shelf and expect employers to admire the label every time. A new calendar replaces the can with a kitchen. You return, you cook, you learn new recipes, you keep the knives sharp, and you prove it by feeding people who are not your mother.
The world is not waiting. Neither should the calendar. Build micro-credentials with integrity, require cumulative demonstrations, schedule requalification every five years, and upgrade the registrar into version control. The degree remains—but as a basecamp. The mountain keeps moving. The point is not to plant the flag once. It is to be the kind of institution that can climb again.
—
#re_v5 (Article 9 of 10 on global higher education issues: Life-long learning)